Archive for December, 2008


Dec

2

What Was Your First Clue That Naftiran Might Be Iranian?


Posted by at 9:52 pm on December 2, 2008
Category: Iran Sanctions

Mansoor Rad
ABOVE: Mansoor Rad
Finance Director
Naftiran


Just before Thanksgiving, the Office of Foreign Asset Controls (“OFAC”) designated a Swiss corporation and a U.K. corporation as entities controlled by the Government of Iran. The two companies involved were Naftiran Intertrade Co. (NICO) SARL, located in Pully, Switzerland, and Naftiran Intertrade Company Ltd., located in Jersey, Channel Islands. Both are subsidiaries of Naftiran Intertrade Company, which in turn is a subsidiary of the National Iranian Oil Company, an agency of Iran’s Ministry of Petroleum.

Of course, the Iranian Transaction Regulations prohibit transactions with any entity owned by the Government of Iran, wherever located and whether or not the entity has been specifically identified by OFAC as owned by the Government of Iran. A non-exhaustive list of such entities is contained in Appendix A to the Iranian Transaction Regulations which, prior to these two latest additions, contained only financial institutions. The appendix is described by OFAC as a “tool to assist … in complying” with the regulations. Thus, the addition of the Naftiran subsidiaries to that appendix does not have any substantive effect.

Because Appendix A is not exhaustive, it’s not in fact a particularly useful compliance tool. Failing to find a company on the list doesn’t mean that it isn’t owned by the Iranian Government. Nor does the addition of these two companies to the appendix provide any information that is otherwise difficult to obtain. The first result of a Google search on the term “Naftiran” is a website that readily shows the connection of Naftiran Intertrade to the Government of Iran.

Instead one has to suspect that this latest order is simply a part of the ongoing public relations campaign of the U.S. government against Iran. The designation — and this post — should serve as a reminder, however, that Google is an exporter’s best friend. No exporter should ever deal with a foreign company otherwise unknown to it without conducting due diligence on the Company. Part of that due diligence is a Google (or other Internet) search which would have, in the case of Naftiran, revealed the Iranian connection, even without OFAC’s latest order.

Permalink Comments Off on What Was Your First Clue That Naftiran Might Be Iranian?

Bookmark and Share


Copyright © 2008 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)

Dec

1

You Shoulda Seen the One That Got Away


Posted by at 8:21 pm on December 1, 2008
Category: DDTC

Fish StoryRegular readers of this blog know that an occasional feature is highlighting press releases by companies that have received their registration number from the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (“DDTC”) and that can’t resist engaging in, shall we say, a little creative elaboration on the significance of registration. Hey, we’ve spent all that money on the registration fee, we ought to get something from it, right?

The latest installment in this feature comes from EPE Corporation, which issued this press release:

EPE Corporation, an EMS provider, announced that they have received their official International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) registration from the US Department of State, Bureau of Political-Military Affairs. … Companies receiving this certification demonstrate that they have knowledge and understanding to fully comply with the AECE and ITAR as well as having corporate procedures and controls in place to ensure compliance.

Has DDTC started administering a test for potential registrants? When is the next one being held?

But wait, there’s more:

To EPE, ITAR registration represents our ongoing commitment to supporting the continued success of our homeland security and defense customers by providing the most secure environment possible.

Why stop there? Why not go the whole nine yards and claim that registration permits the company to give a free pony to each of its customers?

All kidding aside, registration is required for all manufacturers and exporters of defense articles, but obtaining that registration does not represent any endorsement by DDTC that the registrant meets any standard other than the ability to fill out a short form and send it in with the required fees. At most, registration proves that the registrant was aware of the registration requirement. I suppose one might say that this elevates the registrant a little bit above those companies that aren’t even aware of that requirement, but it’s a far cry from demonstrating that the company has “corporate procedures and controls in place to ensure compliance.”

Permalink Comments Off on You Shoulda Seen the One That Got Away

Bookmark and Share


Copyright © 2008 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)