Jun

10

OFAC Action Keeps Sudan’s Embassy From Having Its Lights Shut Off


Posted by at 11:03 am on June 10, 2009
Category: Sudan

Sudanese Embassy in DC
ABOVE: Google Street View of
Protesters at Sudanese Embassy


The Department of Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) published today in the Federal Register a Final Rule amending the Sudanese Sanctions Regulations. The amendment permits U.S. persons to provide services in the United States to Sudanese embassies and diplomatic missions.

Today, OFAC is amending section 538.515 of the SSR. Before its amendment, section 538.515 authorized all transactions ordinarily incident to the importation of any goods or services into the United States destined for official or personal use by the diplomatic missions of the Government of Sudan to the United States and to international organizations located in the United States, subject to certain conditions. OFAC is amending this section to expand the scope of the authorization to include the provision of goods or services in the United States to the diplomatic missions of the Government of Sudan to the United States and the United Nations, and to the employees of the diplomatic missions of the Government of Sudan to the United States and the United Nations, subject to certain conditions.

To fully understand the impact of this amendment, you need to read section 538.406 of the Sudanese Sanctions Regulations which states that the prohibition on providing services to the Government of Sudan under section 538.206 applies when “such services are performed … [i]n the United States.” As a result, before today’s amendment, the provision of electricity, water, trash removal, Internet service to, or even selling office supplies to, the Sudanese Embassy in the United States would have required a license. How many people want to bet that these services were being provided without any licenses?

The lesson here is that although companies engaged in exports from the United States may have in place OFAC compliance procedures, those engaged in basically domestic businesses — like power companies and trash haulers — are often blissfully unaware that OFAC’s regulations may affect their domestic activities. In this instance, some vendor must have called the OFAC hotline and asked about selling things to the Sudanese Embassy, which led to an “oops” moment and a hasty amendment given that OFAC probably never intended to prevent the operation of the Sudanese Embassy on U.S. soil.

Permalink

Bookmark and Share

Copyright © 2009 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)


3 Comments:


Clif – I think this amendment is ominous. OFAC has not, to my knowledge, ever previously taken the position that diplomatic employees require a license to obtain domestic goods or services for their personal use. If this sudden reversal is OFAC’s new position, the due diligence burden to avoid “strict liability” for U.S. cab drivers, grocery stores, and the telephone company is impossible to meet. If a Sudanese mission employee is considered blocked (maybe “acting for the Government of Sudan”?) but now licensed, are all U.S. retailers and service providers in breach for, e.g., maintaining unlicensed personal bank accounts, credit cards, or utility services for Cuban, Iranian and Burmese diplomatic families in the United States?

Comment by Ex-OFAC on June 11th, 2009 @ 9:33 am

I think that this was directed not at provision of services to individual employees for their personal use, but provision of services to the Embassy for its official use which would have been problematic prior to amendment. Sudan is sort of a funny case because it is the only country against whom we’ve imposed comprehensive sanctions but still have diplomatic relations, which causes the issue of how can I provide services to the Embassy versus to the diplomatic personnel of, say, the Cuban Interest section in the Swiss Embassy.

Comment by Clif Burns on June 11th, 2009 @ 9:58 am

So does this mean the Government of Sudan can now retain US vendors to provide services like lobbying, public affairs/media/pr?
Many thanks.

Comment by Colleen Connors on June 11th, 2009 @ 12:14 pm