Nov

9

It Could Happen To You


Posted by at 10:41 pm on November 9, 2011
Category: OFAC

ATMI’m not quite sure what to make of this story of a Fulbright scholar in Norway who appears to get caught up in an OFAC-screening imbroglio and can’t pay her rent. Fortunately, the problem mysteriously disappeared before she winds up sleeping in Oslo’s famed Frogner Park.

The student was trying to wire money to herself from her account in the United States when she was told by her bank that the funds were blocked and that perhaps she should take a gander at the SDN list. She did that and, unable to find her name on the list, optimistically wrote to OFAC for some assistance. (Hey, I heard you back there. Stop snickering at the poor idealistic student.)

Miraculously enough she gets an anonymous response from OFAC, asking for more information, which she sends.

Two days later comes another message from OFAC, this time signed by “Michael Z.” Like Afghans, or spies, he evidently has only one name, but my hopes that he might be an actual person inexplicably rise anyway — only to sink again when he claims OFAC needs yet more information. All this so that Michael Z., presumed person, may help me “more effectively.” (More than what, I wonder?) He is, he insists, trying to locate my money with the help of my bank, which by the way is now blocking me from seeing information about my own account online.

Somewhat later, without explanation, the student’s funds are unblocked, giving a happy, if not particularly satisfying, ending to this odd story.

But here’s the rub. I haven’t mentioned her name yet. I haven’t done so on purpose. This story might make sense if her name was something like Aisha Qadhafi. But it wasn’t. It was Ann Jones.

Permalink

Bookmark and Share

Copyright © 2011 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)


3 Comments:


I’m in the process of drafting a letter to Ms. Jones.

Clearly Ms. Jones did not run afoul of OFAC, as there is nothing even close to “Ann Jones” in the list. (the possible exception would be an extremely fuzzy match to ‘Hana Jon’)

I think the answer actually lies with the Norwegian bank, who, bound by EU 1781 (the EU implementation of FATF SR VII), scanned the inbound wire from the US bank for full originating party details, didn’t like what they saw and asked the US bank for every piece of data they could under their policy and the EU law. I’m guessing they asked for a passport number, date and place of birth.

OFAC, being OFAC, turned an inquiry into a data-gathering exercise.

I think Ms. Jones, who writes for The Nation, could write a much more powerful piece on OFAC and daily life if she found and interviewed people in the US with the names “Steven Law”, “Alicia Martinez”, “Linda Ramirez” or “Peter Griffin”.

Comment by Scott on November 10th, 2011 @ 12:01 pm

Stories like this make me shake my head. Judging by your post all of the women name “Patricia” should be worried particularly if they live in Cali, CO. She’s been on the denied parties list for years. No last name given.

Comment by LDM on November 10th, 2011 @ 1:53 pm

Funny – had a similar case several years ago, where a Fulbright awardee bound for Iran to do field work in musicology could not get State to release her scholarship funds without OFAC permission – and OFAC balked because the individual was taking her digital camera!! But then the funds appeared without any notice or official communication. Very odd I’d say.

Comment by John Liebman on November 11th, 2011 @ 5:45 pm