Mar

25

Did the Export Administration Regulations Drop a Few Pounds?


Posted by at 8:53 pm on March 25, 2008
Category: BISIran Sanctions

Code of Federal RegulationsWhile everyone in the export community is enjoying a little schadenfreude over the Department of Defense’s inadvertent export of nuclear missile fuses to Taiwan, we shouldn’t lose sight that there are still plenty of civilian exporters that might want to tighten up their own compliance programs, assuming that they even have them. Case in point a California-based microwave electronics company profiled in this article in its local newspaper the El Dorado Hills Telegraph. The company, Genesis Microwave, has every reason to have a good export compliance program not only because it produces dual-use goods subject to the Export Administration Regulations, but also because one of its employees recently pleaded guilty to providing dual-use microwave technology to foreign companies without a license.

Here is what the company’s CEO Santiago Cutia, Jr., had to say about the application of U.S. export laws to his products:

“It’s really hard,” Cutia said. “When I see a request for quotation from a country on the National Security List, I know we would need to acquire an export license. For example, take a company from Iran. First, you need an end-user statement, who’s going to be using the product. Then, you have to submit it to the federal Bureau of Industry and Security.”

This must be done not just company by company that a U.S. firm might want to deal with, but rather contract by contract. The same government-approved Irani company that a U.S. firm sold to six months ago can call, and the entire licensing work must be repeated for each new contract, Cutia said.

I’m sure it will come as something of a surprise to BIS that it is approving exports of dual-use technology to companies in Iran. Note to export control compliance officers: make sure your CEO does more than sign the first page of the compliance program and actually reads it before talking to reporters about export regulations.

The article has one other gem, presumably also conveyed by the CEO to the reporter:

Federal tech-export regulations run to 61 pages, double-column.

In our dreams.

Permalink

Bookmark and Share

Copyright © 2008 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)


3 Comments:


Do you mean “we shouldn’t lost SIGHT?” 🙂

Enjoyed your blog – quite informational. Thanks.

Comment by Jilly Lin on March 26th, 2008 @ 1:36 pm

I meant LOSE!

Comment by Jilly Lin on March 26th, 2008 @ 1:37 pm

Yes, it should have been “sight” not “site.” Thanks. I’ve fixed it.

Comment by Clif Burns on March 26th, 2008 @ 1:39 pm