Jun

6

BIS Issues Temporary Denial Order in Cirrus Electronics Matter


Posted by at 10:46 pm on June 6, 2007
Category: BIS

Vikram Surabhai Space CenterThe Bureau of Industry and Security (“BIS”) has issued a temporary denial order against everyone in sight involved in the Cirrus Electronics matter. As we previously reported, Cirrus Electronics took orders for electronic components from the Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre (”VSSC”) and Bharat Dynamics, Ltd (”BDL”) both Indian-government related companies on the Entity List.

Cirrus would then use a U.S. subsidiary to source these parts from U.S. vendors. The U.S. subsidiary would then ship the components to Cirrus in Singapore which would then ship the components to VSSC and BDL without obtaining the licenses required by BIS for exports to parties on the Entity List. When the U.S. vendors requested end-use statements for the parts being sold to Cirrus, Cirrus would lie to them and claim that the parts were destined for the Navy Physical and Oceanographic Laboratory in Kochi, India.

The temporary denial order, not surprisingly, emphasized the false end-use reports to the U.S. vendors as proof that Cirrus and its principals had knowledge that exports to VSSC and BDL required licenses. For those who think that this blog criticizes everything that BIS does, we state — for the record — that if the allegations in the TDO are true, Cirrus and its principals got what they deserved.

Permalink

Bookmark and Share

Copyright © 2007 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)


4 Comments:


It may be moot: Their web site is gone.

Comment by Mike Deal on June 7th, 2007 @ 9:02 am

And two of the company principals listed in the TDO are in jail. But there are some other named individuals in the TDO, current or former employees of Cirrus or its affiliates, that are on the loose.

Comment by Clif Burns on June 7th, 2007 @ 9:04 am

Of course, I’ll refrain from pointing out that there still is no statutory authority for a TDO under IEEPA and that at best, the government would have to find some way to bootstrap to get a court to issue a TRO or injunction.

Comment by Mike Deal on June 7th, 2007 @ 5:30 pm

Whew, Mike! I was getting worried there when you didn’t mention the IEEPA issue in your first comment. I thought you might have gone soft all of a sudden. 🙂

Comment by Clif Burns on June 7th, 2007 @ 5:33 pm