Author Archive


Aug

6

DHL Agrees to 9.44 Million Dollar Fine


Posted by at 12:31 pm on August 6, 2009
Category: General

Not a real photographIf sometime mid-morning you heard a loud cheer followed by exclamations of “It’s about time!”, what you heard was small to middle-market exporters cheering the announcement of a settlement agreement between DHL and two federal export agencies, the Bureau of Industry and Security (“BIS”) and the Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC’). Under the Settlement Agreement, DHL agreed to pay to the two agencies $9.44 million in penalties for allegations that DHL unlawfully aided and abetted the illegal exportation of goods to Syria, Iran and Sudan and failed to comply with record keeping requirements of the Export Administration Regulations and OFAC regulations. OFAC specifically alleged “thousands” of shipments by DHL to Iran and Sudan.

The reason for this sudden eruption of schadenfreude among some sectors of the export community is that many exporters have relied on companies like DHL to assist them through the regulatory thickets of exporting from the U.S only to find that these companies failed to comply with all the requirements. The results of this non-compliance are voluntary disclosures made, and fines paid, by the exporters while the freight forwarders like DHL get off scot free. Too many exporters, particularly those without a large number of export transactions, are forced to rely on DHL and others to lodge licenses, make AES entries, handle endorsements of the license to decrement the value of the license, and so forth. And when that isn’t properly done, it’s often the exporters that pay the price.

Another interesting part of the DHL settlement is that, according to the OFAC press release,

Many of the shipments were intercepted and reported to OFAC by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Customs and Border Protection (CBP)

Say what? This means that DHL was sending packages out of the country where the destination on the air waybill was Iran or Sudan or another sanctioned country. How on earth could that have happened? I think the only reasonable conclusion is that DHL’s employees only used the company’s compliance program when they tore out pages to make paper airplanes to throw down the hall. I’m kidding, of course, but you do have to wonder how DHL could show up at the border with packages headed to Iran, Syria and Sudan.

In better news for DHL, the Jamaica Exporter’s Association today awarded DHL its annual prize as the “best-in-class transportation company that enables and supports the growth of Jamaica’s export industry.” Have a Red Stripe, fellows. You not only deserve it, you probably need it too!

UPDATE: Here is the link to settlement documents.

[NOTE: the photograph illustrating this post is not an actual photo taken in Tehran but a humorous illustration created through the magic of image-editing software.]

Permalink Comments (9)

Bookmark and Share


Copyright © 2009 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)

Aug

4

OFAC Fines Exporter For Failure To Recognize Red Flags


Posted by at 8:53 pm on August 4, 2009
Category: Cuba Sanctions

Cuba PosterThe Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) released last Friday its monthly report of civil penalties it imposed for violations of the economic sanctions programs administered by the agency. I was particularly interested in the announcement of a $10,341.00 fine imposed against, and paid by, MGE UPS based on allegations that the California-based company “sold electrical regulators ultimately destined for Cuba.” According to the penalty report, MGE didn’t voluntarily disclose the violation.

The allegation that the goods were “ultimately destined for Cuba” is interesting because it indicates that MGE didn’t ship the goods to Cuba but shipped the goods outside the country — likely to Schneider Electric, its parent company in France — and that the goods were then sent from outside the U.S. to Cuba. The penalty notice provides further information as to what occurred when it cites the following “aggravating factor” relied on by OFAC in assessing the penalty:

OFAC also determines that the following aggravating factor is present: the regional sales manager should have recognized that the shipment in question might be destined for Cuba and taken steps to stop the transaction.

Notice that MGE isn’t being fined for exporting directly to Cuba. Nor is it being fined for an export knowing that it was going to be re-exported to Cuba. It was fined because one its regional sales managers “should have recognized that the shipment … might be destined for Cuba.” It seems to me that if OFAC is going to fine exporters because an employee should have known that something might go to Cuba — a standard that could arguably be applied to any export to an E.U. country — the agency has an obligation to the export community to indicate what red flags were ignored here and what sorts of other “red flags” can serve as a basis for liability under such a theory.

Another interesting factor here is that OFAC was probably tipped off to the export of the MGE equipment to Cuba by the Cubans themselves who complained that Schneider Electric’s acquisition of API somehow or other derailed planned exports of MGE products to Cuba. Look at this from the website of Cuba’s Permanent Mission to the United Nations:

The merger resulting in the formation of ARC-MGE between the manufacturer MGE UPS Systems, part of the French Schneider Electric, and the American manufacturer APC, has created serious problems for supply of three-phase UPSs to Cuba’s Ecosol. After lengthy delays in arranging purchases of this product, accompanied by false promises that the merger would not affect supply, the French APC-MGE told the Cuban company that it was to cease operations on the instructions of APC and would not be honouring its contractual commitments. Its executives in the Dominican Republic as well as those in France requested that they should not be contacted again, as this would place them in a difficult position. The supplies in question were destined for the University of Computing Sciences (UCI), the Neurological Hospital, the Institute of Cardiovascular Surgery and an amusement park.

Schneider bought APC in 2006. The exports resulting in the OFAC fine occurred in September 2005, prior to APC’s objection to Cuba sales.

Permalink Comments (6)

Bookmark and Share


Copyright © 2009 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)

Jul

30

U.S. Envoy to Sudan Criticizes Sanctions


Posted by at 8:28 pm on July 30, 2009
Category: Sudan

Sudan"The day after Susan Rice, the U.S. Ambassador to the U.N., threatened new sanctions on Eritrea, Jonathan S. Gration, the U.S. Special Envoy to Sudan, in testimony given today before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, called for the sanctions against Sudan to be lifted. According to this report in the Christian Science Monitor, Gration questioned whether genocide is ongoing in Sudan and stated that there was no evidence to support Sudan’s continued designation as a “state sponsor of terrorism.” Instead, that designation and the sanctions only hindered efforts, he claimed, to rebuild the country and to help dislocated Sudanese living in camps.

Interestingly, not one word of this was in Gration’s prepared remarks which had been submitted in advance to the Committee. The remarks about genocide in Sudan and the call for lifting the current sanctions appeared to have been delivered off-the-cuff. This probably reflects the internal debate at the White House about the Sudan Sanctions. Ambassador Rice was said, according to the same story in the Monitor, to have become furious over Gration’s remarks earlier this month about the “remnants of genocide” in Sudan.

Permalink Comments (1)

Bookmark and Share


Copyright © 2009 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)

Jul

29

If Sanctions Fell on Eritrea, Would Anyone Feel Them?


Posted by at 7:08 pm on July 29, 2009
Category: Eritrea Sanctions

Eritrean StampIn testimony before the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Susan Rice, the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, rattled the sanctions saber against Eritrea, saying that the Eritrean government had only a “short window of time” to improve its relationship with the United States or be subject to sanctions. Rice did not specify what sanctions she had in mind.

The U.S. has accused Eritrea for quite some time of supporting Al-Qaeda linked groups in neighboring Somalia. Based on these allegations, the U.S. imposed an arms embargo in October 2008. That embargo was largely symbolic because in the prior year no military sales had been made from the United States to Eritrea.

If the United States unilaterally attempts to impose restrictions on imports and exports to Eritrea, these restrictions are likely to be just as symbolic as the arms embargo. In 2008, U.S. exports to Eritrea totaled just under $15 million, which is about 3% of Eritrea’s annual estimated imports of approximately $500 million. U.S. imports from Eritrea are even less significant, coming in at a whopping $129,000 in 2008. And whether or not the U.S. could enlist the U.N. or other countries in imposing new sanctions remains to be seen.

Permalink Comments (2)

Bookmark and Share


Copyright © 2009 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)

Jul

28

Syrian Sanctions Relief Announced


Posted by at 7:34 pm on July 28, 2009
Category: Syria

Syrian Arab Airlines 747According to this article in the New York Times, the Obama administration announced today more easing of the sanctions against Syria, stating that it would begin expedited case-by-case consideration of export licenses to Syria:

The move will particularly affect “requests to export products related to information technology and telecommunication equipment and parts and components related to the safety of civil aviation,” said a State Department spokesman, Andrew J. Laine.

Sanctions on Syria were imposed by Congressional mandate pursuant to the Syrian Accountability and Lebanese Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2003. Section 5 of that Act required the President to block exports of all items on the United States Munitions List and the Commerce Control List to Syria. It also required the President to impose at least two of six specific sanctions set forth in the legislation. The two that he selected were, first, the ban on all exports to Syria other than food and medicine and, second, a prohibition on Syrian aircraft landing in, or overflying, the United States (with the exceptions of aircraft carrying Syrian government officials on government business in the United States).

In implementing the Act and the Executive Order, BIS had considered, on a case-by-case basis license applications to export medical devices, aircraft parts and telecommunications equipment. In February of this year, BIS approved the export of aircraft parts to put two mothballed Syrian Arab Airlines 747s back in service.

Section 5(b) of the Syria Accountability Act permits the President to waive any of the acts required export controls if the President finds that such a waiver is in the interest of national security and reports those reasons to the relevant Congressional committees. Although Andrew Laine’s statement re-affirms the more liberal policy towards aircraft parts and telecommunications, the White House’s statements also suggest that the waiver power may be exercised outside the pre-existing categories of medical devices, aircraft parts, and telecommunications equipment.

One area the the White House should consider further liberalizing would be medical devices and the elimination of a license requirement for exports to Syria of medical devices. Under the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act of 2000 (“TSRA”), medical devices could be exported to Syria without a license. Because the Syria Accountability Act only referred to exceptions for “food and medicine,” the prior administration had interpreted this as over-ruling TSRA and as requiring licenses for medical devices, even though it seems likely that the phrase “food and medicine” was simply a sloppy reference to TSRA and not intended to affect the status of medical devices. Use of the waiver procedure under section 5(b) would allow the President to correct this mistake.

Permalink Comments Off on Syrian Sanctions Relief Announced

Bookmark and Share


Copyright © 2009 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)