The State and Treasury Departments announced today new Iranian sanctions against Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, the Basij Resistance Force, and Iran’s national police and its chief. These sanctions, which would block all assets in the United States held by these groups, arise from human rights’ abuses by Iran committed by these groups.

State Department Deputy Spokesperson Mark C. Toner was discussing these sanctions in today’s Daily Press Briefing when an astute reporter asked the obvious question: do these entities have any assets that will be blocked by these sanctions. I mean, really, does anyone actually think that the Islamic Revolutionary Guard, the Iranian police or their chief have any assets in the United States?

The interchange between Toner and the reporter is both amusing and instructive as Toner tries, not so deftly, to dodge the question:

QUESTION: I have two questions about the sanctions announcements that were made this morning jointly with Treasury. One, can you tell us to what extent, if at all, any of the three designated entities or the one designated individual have assets that fall under U.S. jurisdiction?

MR. TONER: I do not know that. I believe, as you said, that this action will block or freeze property and interest in property for designated persons or designated entities, and U.S. persons are prohibited from engaging in transactions involving the persons and entities.

QUESTION: (Sneeze.)

MR. TONER: God bless you. But I can’t give you a breakdown of what assets may be affected by that.

QUESTION: Can you check for us to see if the Departments of State or Treasury believe that these entities and the individual have any assets or any significant assets that would be captured or frozen by this? And if not, what is the significance of that –

MR. TONER: Well –

QUESTION: Wait. Let me finish.

MR. TONER: Okay.

QUESTION: What is the significance of it? In the past, you have sometimes argued that – or U.S. officials have sometimes argued that there is a multiplier effect because other financial institutions will steer clear of such entities or individuals for fear of falling afoul.

MR. TONER: That’s a good answer.

QUESTION: I know it is, and I understand this, but I’d really much rather have it out of a U.S. official than me, so if you can check.

MR. TONER: Well, certainly, Arshad. But I mean this – I – as I said, I can’t give you a clear breakdown and I would refer you to –

QUESTION: I didn’t ask for a breakdown. I asked for whether you have – they have any assets or any significant assets. I’m not asking for a breakdown. I’m asking, do they have any assets or significant assets?

MR. TONER: Okay. And I will endeavor to get that for you.

QUESTION: Thanks.

MR. TONER: But again, what’s important here is the bite, if you will, of these sanctions is only one element. It also sends a clear message that we won’t abide by Iran’s continued human rights abuses.

Yes, he really did say that the bark may be worse than the bite.

Permalink


Copyright © 2011 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)