Sep

28

“The scent of bitter almonds always reminded him of the fate of unrequited love . . .”


Posted by at 8:21 pm on September 28, 2010
Category: BIS

cyanideMassachusetts-based New England Trading Global Inc. (“NET Global”) recently agreed to pay to the Bureau of Industry and Security (“BIS”) a $365,000 suspended penalty in connection with thirteen unlicensed exports of sodium cyanide and potassium cyanide worth $242,779 without a license to Israel. The fine was suspended on condition that the company not engage in any export violations for a period of one year. According to the settlement documents, the company voluntarily disclosed the exports to BIS.

Sodium cyanide and potassium cyanide are classified as ECCN 1C350.d.17 and 1C350.d.12 respectively. Given the legendary toxicity of both substances, this should come as a surprise to no one, particularly to a company that sells chemicals. So one can only speculate how NET Global wound up shipping more than 100 tons of cyanide without a license. Whatever happened, it had to be, at best, a massive failure to implement compliance procedures and the company should thank its lucky stars that the penalty in this case was conditionally suspended.

Permalink

Bookmark and Share

Copyright © 2010 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)


2 Comments:


This is a bitter pill to swallow for those exporters whose missteps were made at much lower dollar amounts with products not nearly as lethal as cyanide, but were nevertheless nailed for hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines in the wake of voluntary disclosures. Inconsistencies in these cases will persist so long as there is no truly independent reviewing authority to whom exporters may resort. Is the moral of this story that it is better to have been totally ignorant of export control regulations than to have been aware of them, but failed to apply them properly? Voluntary disclosures to BIS = caveat emptor.

Comment by John Liebman on September 29th, 2010 @ 3:52 pm

Gee, lets do the math. $365,000/100 $3650 a ton? 1.83 a pound? Thats a fine? It sounds like the airfrieght rate!

Comment by Mike Liberto on September 29th, 2010 @ 5:37 pm