<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ExportLawBlog &#187; USML</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/category/usml/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com</link>
	<description>Latest News on DDTC, BIS, OFAC, and other export law matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:42:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The CBP Is Mightier Than The Sword</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/414</link>
		<comments>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/414#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 01:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clif Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Customs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USML]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ABOVE: USML Category II(a) I always tell clients that even an obsolete military item can be on the United States Munitions List (&#8220;USML&#8221;) and require an export license. Still, not all obsolete military items are on the USML. Maces, catapults, jousting poles, caltrops, scythed chariots, spears, arrows, and siege hooks immediately come to mind. Swords [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/414/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
