Archive for the ‘U.N. Sanctions’ Category


Mar

13

Additional U.N. Sanctions on Iran Seem Likely


Posted by at 5:32 pm on March 13, 2007
Category: U.N. Sanctions

Iranian proliferationA number of news reports, including this report from the AP, indicate that the six nations negotiating a U.N. Security Council resolution imposing a second set of sanctions on Iran are close to an agreement. In December 2006, the Security Council adopted Resolution 1737, which directed U.N. members to stop supplying materials to Iran that could be used for nuclear and missile proliferation and which froze the assets of various Iranian firms and individuals involved in proliferation activities. Iran responded by stepping up its uranium enrichment activities which led to the second round of sanctions negotiations.

Proposals to impose a travel ban on Iranian officials have been dropped from the new sanctions. Similarly, the new sanctions are not expected to include a ban on arms exports to Iran. However, it seems clear that the proposal will forbid imports of arms from Iran, loans to the government of Iran, and an expansion of the list of Iranian individuals and companies subject to an asset freeze.

Since current U.S. sanctions already forbid import of Iranian arms and loans to the government of Tehran, the expansion of the list of blocked firms and individuals is the part of the resolution that will be most significant to U.S. exporters and companies. Although it seems certain that the list will be expanded, there is still some disagreement over who to include on that list. For example, the United States is pushing to include all firms owned by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard on the list but is encountering some resistance. The Russians have whimsically argued that the Revolutionary Guard is an “institution” in Iran and are hesitant to penalize an institution. There’s little point in trying to make sense of that argument because the Russians, of course, aren’t terribly keen on sanctioning Iran in the first place but can’t very well admit that.

Permalink Comments Off on Additional U.N. Sanctions on Iran Seem Likely

Bookmark and Share


Copyright © 2007 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)

Oct

31

Guns and Gladiolas: Viktor Bout’s Path to the SDN List


Posted by at 3:08 pm on October 31, 2006
Category: OFACU.N. Sanctions

Only known photo of Viktor BoutYesterday OFAC issued a new set of designations of individuals under the sanctions regime for the Democratic Republic of the Congo. In that designation, OFAC amended the designation of Viktor Anatolijevitch Bout to include the DRC Sanctions as the reason for designation in addition to the Liberia sanctions under which Bout had already been designated.

Mr. Bout has a more interesting story than most SDNs. Starting in 1992, Bout built a network of aircraft that he used to carry everything from guns to gladiolas. It was the former product, and not the latter, which got Mr. Bout into hot water. There appeared to be substantial evidence that bout was running weapons to the Northern Alliance in Afghanistan, the Taliban, Angola and the UNITA rebels that sought to overthrow Angola, Charles Taylor of Liberia and Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi.

After the U.S. incursion into Iraq, Mr. Bout also began to provide services to the U.S. military and its contractors. Shortly after the fall of Baghdad, the United States coordinated a massive airlift of goods and supplies into Iraq. According to a just-published article in Foreign Policy by Douglas Farah and Stephen Braun, Bout played a role in that airlift:

But to their embarrassment, U.S. officials later learned that many of the Russian planes were operated by companies and crews working for Viktor Bout. His planes were flying Federal Express shipments for the U.S. Air Force, tents for the U.S. Army, and oil field equipment and personnel for KBR, a Halliburton subsidiary. In the months that followed, Bout’s flagship firm flew hundreds of sorties in and out of Baghdad, earning millions of dollars from U.S. taxpayers.

Bout’s involvement in the Iraq airlift caused the U.S. to delay impositions of sanctions on Bout. OFAC continued to squabble with the Pentagon which claimed that it had no obligation to scrutinize second-tier subcontractors such as Bout, who was ferrying items for KBR. Finally in April 2005, sanctions were imposed on Bout for his dealings with the Charles Taylor regime of Liberia. UN Sanctions followed in November 2005. Even so, there appears to be evidence that Bout-operated planes have continued to ferry goods into Baghdad’s airport, at least according to Farah and Braun.

The purpose of designating Bout under a second sanctions regime at this point seems unclear. Perhaps OFAC hopes that this might double the penalty for dealing with Bout, although the legal basis for such a supposition is doubtful. More likely it may be to preserve a second basis for sanctions against Bout if the Liberia sanctions should be ended for some reason.

In all events, Mr. Bout is alive and well in Moscow. He has always claimed that he has no idea, absolutely no idea whatsoever, what was in those packages he delivered throughout the world to rebels and dictators. He continues to reside in a luxury apartment complex and to carry on his business undeterred. As Messrs. Farah and Braun state:

Conceding their difficult straits, U.S. officials admit that there is no clear evidence that Bout’s air fleet has been diminished or his activities slackened as a result of the sanctions. “You never can say with 100 percent certainty that he is gone,” says Zarate—who is now President George W. Bush’s chief counterterror deputy at the NSC. “He is very, very good at doing his business.” The Europeans find it equally hard. “He doesn’t go away. He just keeps changing his aircraft and registrations, hoping that he will outlast the interest in following him,” says a European military intelligence source. “So far, he is right.”

Permalink Comments Off on Guns and Gladiolas: Viktor Bout’s Path to the SDN List

Bookmark and Share


Copyright © 2006 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)

Sep

20

Japan and Australia Sanction North Korea


Posted by at 4:52 pm on September 20, 2006
Category: U.N. Sanctions

North Korean Propaganda PosterJapan and Australia announced new sanctions today against North Korea. Under the new sanctions, Japan and Australia will block fund transfers to and from 11 North Korean companies deemed to be essential to the North Korea’s weapons program.

These actions were based on U.N. Resolution 1695 passed by the U.N. Security Council on July 15. The resolution, which condemned missile tests by North Korea on July 5, called on U.N. member states “to exercise vigilance and prevent . . . the transfer of any financial resources in relation to DPRK’s missile or WMD programmes.”

Japan and Australia included the Swiss firm Kohas AG and its President Jakob Steiger in the newly-announced sanctions. Kohas was sanctioned by the United States in March of this year based on its procurement of weapons-related goods for Korea Ryonbong General Corporation, a North Korean trading company sanctioned by the U.S. and included today in the new Japanese and Australia sanctions. Almost half of Kohas’s shares are owned by Korea Ryonbong.

In response to the sanctions imposed today on Kohas, a Swiss official responded: “Federal authorities are regularly in contact with this firm and have yet to find any evidence that the company violated Swiss exporting rules.” That is perhaps more a reflection of the fact that the Swiss aren’t looking very hard than it is evidence that no violations have occurred.

Permalink Comments Off on Japan and Australia Sanction North Korea

Bookmark and Share


Copyright © 2006 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)