<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ExportLawBlog &#187; SEC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/category/sec/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com</link>
	<description>Latest News on DDTC, BIS, OFAC, and other export law matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:42:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>AMD Queried By SEC Over AMD Chips In Iran</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/544</link>
		<comments>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/544#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 01:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clif Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Iran Sanctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An earlier post here reported that the SEC has sent a letter to Intel inquiring as to how Intel Celeron microprocessors wound up in computers being sold in Cuba. According to an article in yesterday&#8217;s Wall Street Journal, Intel&#8217;s &#8220;misery&#8221; has a little company in arch-rival AMD, which also received a letter from the SEC [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/544/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#161;Viva El Celeron Libre!</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/541</link>
		<comments>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/541#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 19:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clif Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cuba Sanctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A report today in the Internet edition of Electronics Weekly brought to my attention some correspondence back in June between the Securities and Exchange Commission (&#8220;SEC&#8221;) and Intel. The correspondence arose from newspaper reports in May that Cuba had lifted its ban on sales of PCs to individuals and that, as a result, a PC [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/541/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEC List of Companies Doing Business in Terror States Taken Down</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/201</link>
		<comments>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/201#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 20:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clif Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;d like to think that our post critical of the SEC&#8217;s list of public companies doing business in Syria, Sudan, Cuba, North Korea, and Iran had something to do with the SEC&#8217;s decision to remove the list from its website. But, in all honesty, we&#8217;ll have to admit that a storm of protest from more [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/201/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEC Is Making A List, Not Checking It Twice</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/189</link>
		<comments>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/189#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 00:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clif Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanctions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new link has appeared on the home page of the Securities and Exchange Commission&#8217;s website. Under &#8220;Investor Information&#8221; there is a link called &#8220;State Sponsors of Terrorism&#8221; Hmmm, you wonder, the SEC now thinks that investors need to know which countries are state sponsors of terrorism? Perhaps, because when you click the link, there&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/189/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Land Rover, Land Rover, Send Darfur a Range Rover!</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/65</link>
		<comments>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/65#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 04:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clif Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanctions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/65</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may not have heard of the SEC&#8217;s relatively new Office of Global Security Risk. But Ford Motor has heard of the OGSR. And I suspect export professionals will hear more of this SEC office in the future. The OGSR is tasked with reviewing SEC filings to determine whether particular publicly-traded companies are subject to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/65/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
