<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ExportLawBlog &#187; NRC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/category/nrc/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com</link>
	<description>Latest News on DDTC, BIS, OFAC, and other export law matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:42:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How Not to Make a Dirty Bomb</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/125</link>
		<comments>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/125#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 14:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clif Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NRC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an earlier post about Nuclear Regulatory Commission controls on the export of americium-241, the isotope used in smoke alarms, we discussed a group of competency-challenged terrorists who were planning on building a dirty bomb from smoke alarms. In an excellent article in this week&#8217;s New Yorker, Steve Coll provides more details on the not-so-alarming [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/125/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NRC Loosens Libya Controls</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/88</link>
		<comments>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/88#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 17:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clif Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NRC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/88</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Six months after the State Department removed Libya from the list of state sponsors of terrorism, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission got around to changing its regulations to reflect this removal. In a Federal Register notice issued Friday the NRC amended its rules and changed Libya&#8217;s status from an &#8220;embargoed country&#8221; under 10 C.F.R. § 110.28 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/88/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NRC Agrees To Reveal Export Quantities in License Applications</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/24</link>
		<comments>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/24#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clif Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NRC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/24</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A license is required from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to export certain nuclear materials. Those license applications are typically printed in the Federal Register for comment. After 9/11 the NRC deleted certain information from the Federal Register Notice, including the precise quantity to be exported, such as it did in this Federal Register notice of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/24/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
