<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ExportLawBlog &#187; ITAR Creep</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/category/itar-creep/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com</link>
	<description>Latest News on DDTC, BIS, OFAC, and other export law matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 11:06:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New York Branch of Italian Bank Investigated For Iran Violations</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/469</link>
		<comments>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/469#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 22:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clif Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ITAR Creep]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Italian wire service Adnkronos International reported today that the New York branch of Italian bank Intesa Sanpaolo is under investigation in the United States in connection with its involvement in U.S.-dollar wire transfers originated by sanctioned banks and individuals in Iran. Although few details are given in the report, it appears that investigators are claiming [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/469/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DDTC Still Can&#8217;t Find Its Way With Inertial Navigational Chips</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/179</link>
		<comments>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/179#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 01:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clif Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DDTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAR Creep]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The QRS-11 navigational chip, perhaps the poster child for the so-called ITAR creep phenomenon, still bedevils the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls. Today, the DDTC issued a final rule amending the rule excluding the QRS-11 chip from the United States Munitions List. The rule attempts to address wider integration of the chip in civil aircraft [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/179/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
