<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ExportLawBlog &#187; DDTC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/category/ddtc/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com</link>
	<description>Latest News on DDTC, BIS, OFAC, and other export law matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:42:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Registration Follies</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1998</link>
		<comments>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1998#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 01:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clif Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DDTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Part 122]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=1998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regular readers are no doubt familiar with this blog&#8217;s occasional posts poking fun of press releases from defense manufacturers noting that the company had &#8220;achieved&#8221; registration with the State Department&#8217;s Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (&#8220;DDTC&#8221;). A common feature of many of these press releases is to try to portray registration under Part 122 of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1998/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Export Reform Boulder Moves Further Up Mountain</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1888</link>
		<comments>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1888#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 20:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clif Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DDTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Export Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OFAC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=1888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An article (subscription required) in the latest issue of Inside U.S. Trade describes an interview the publication held with a &#8220;senior administration official&#8221; on the White House&#8217;s proposed export control reforms. According to the official, an interagency agreement should occur shortly that will allow the agencies to move forward in implementing one export license application [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1888/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Do What I Say&#8221; Etc., Etc.</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1850</link>
		<comments>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1850#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 22:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clif Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DDTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deemed Exports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical Data Export]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=1850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In case you can&#8217;t read the text of the &#8220;WARNING&#8221; in this RFP from the Naval Air Systems Command sent to me by an alert reader, it says: WARNING: THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS TECHNICAL DATA WHOSE EXPORT IS RESTRICTED BY THE ARMS EXPORT CONTROL ACT (TITLE 22, U.S.C. SEC 2751 ET SEQ) OR THE EXPORT ADMINISTRATION [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1850/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Reggie Award Goes to Prototron Circuits</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1823</link>
		<comments>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1823#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 22:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clif Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DDTC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=1823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regular readers know that an on-going feature involves examining press releases issued by companies after they have registered their company with the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (&#8220;DDTC&#8221;) as required under Part 122 of the International Traffic in Arms Regulations. All of these press releases seems to be punched out from the same template and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1823/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bad Applicants! You&#8217;re All Getting Detention!!</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1777</link>
		<comments>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1777#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 04:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clif Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DDTC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=1777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (&#8220;DDTC&#8221;), the State Department agency responsible for licensing exports of defense articles, has issued new guidance to scold export license applicants for not using precise names legal names in license applications. Like confusing &#8220;that&#8221; for &#8220;which&#8221; and vice versa, minor name inaccuracies begin the legendary slide down the even [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1777/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One List to Rule Them All, One Agency to Find Them (UPDATED)</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1660</link>
		<comments>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1660#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 22:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clif Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DDTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Export Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=1660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The speech given this morning by Secretary of Defense Robert Gates to a business group detailing the administration&#8217;s plan for export reform is now posted on the Department of Defense website and can be found here. It is an ambitious and laudable proposal and one that, unfortunately, will likely die a slow and painful death [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1660/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ex-Employee Accuses Security Company of ITAR Violations</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1517</link>
		<comments>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1517#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 21:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clif Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DDTC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=1517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the potential benefits of a voluntary disclosure of export violations to the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (&#8220;DDTC&#8221;) are not a sufficient motivation, exporters should remember that today&#8217;s happy employee can be tomorrow&#8217;s disgruntled former employee. The disgruntled former employee is then happy in only one respect: all too happy to blow the whistle [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1517/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pinch Yourself.  You&#8217;re Not Dreaming</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1502</link>
		<comments>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1502#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 01:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clif Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DDTC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=1502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1502/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Hints at Specific Export Reforms</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1441</link>
		<comments>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1441#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 01:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clif Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DDTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deemed Exports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Encryption]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=1441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, in his speech before the Ex-Im Bank, President Obama provided some details about the specific export control reforms which might be in the offing. The first relates to our ludicrously archaic and burdensome system of encryption controls. Obama promised to streamline the review process for &#8220;products with encryption capabilities like cell phone and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1441/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Now You See It, Now You Don&#8217;t</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1410</link>
		<comments>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1410#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 03:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clif Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DDTC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=1410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought I was seeing things. First, I read a notice on the website of the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (&#8220;DDTC&#8221;) saying that DDTC was putting a temporary hold on export licenses where BAE Systems was an applicant or manufacturer while the agency studied BAE&#8217;s recent guilty plea to charges that it paid bribes [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1410/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
