<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ITAR? What&#8217;s An ITAR? Is It Like an iPod?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/828/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/828</link>
	<description>Latest News on DDTC, BIS, OFAC, and other export law matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 16:17:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Slone  Pearson</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/828/comment-page-1#comment-91852</link>
		<dc:creator>Slone  Pearson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=828#comment-91852</guid>
		<description>Word must have spread quickly, they pulled the boat from their web page!

I practice in the area of export control in Portland, OR...I&#039;ll make sure to send them my card ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Word must have spread quickly, they pulled the boat from their web page!</p>
<p>I practice in the area of export control in Portland, OR&#8230;I&#8217;ll make sure to send them my card <img src='http://www.exportlawblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hamish</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/828/comment-page-1#comment-91847</link>
		<dc:creator>Hamish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=828#comment-91847</guid>
		<description>Cliff

But is the classification Category VI(a) or is it that of an aircraft (Cat VIII) or an Amphibious vehicle in Cat VII?

I have two thoughts:

1) If the Black SUVs have arrived, i hope that they have got their paperwork done correctly - it appears that there is plenty of room for an inappropriate search if the wording is not quite correct.

2) If you are legitimately trading in Hovercraft and their components then there are wide variations in the classification of engines etc. (SME etc).
Does anyone have experience of this?

Hamish</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cliff</p>
<p>But is the classification Category VI(a) or is it that of an aircraft (Cat VIII) or an Amphibious vehicle in Cat VII?</p>
<p>I have two thoughts:</p>
<p>1) If the Black SUVs have arrived, i hope that they have got their paperwork done correctly &#8211; it appears that there is plenty of room for an inappropriate search if the wording is not quite correct.</p>
<p>2) If you are legitimately trading in Hovercraft and their components then there are wide variations in the classification of engines etc. (SME etc).<br />
Does anyone have experience of this?</p>
<p>Hamish</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hillbilly</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/828/comment-page-1#comment-91846</link>
		<dc:creator>Hillbilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=828#comment-91846</guid>
		<description>But what if it has been thoroughly demilitarized?  The hulk of the ex-USS Bennington, CV-20, was exported to India for scrapping circa 1994-95 as &quot;G-DEST&quot; after sale as surplus by DoD&#039;s DRMS. While &quot;demilitarization&quot; alone might not suffice for a US-origin vessel under DRMS contract terms now in effect, if the once military hovercraft has had all weapons and ITAR controlled navigation and communications systems removed, could it not be &quot;substantially transformed&quot; into a commercial ferry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But what if it has been thoroughly demilitarized?  The hulk of the ex-USS Bennington, CV-20, was exported to India for scrapping circa 1994-95 as &#8220;G-DEST&#8221; after sale as surplus by DoD&#8217;s DRMS. While &#8220;demilitarization&#8221; alone might not suffice for a US-origin vessel under DRMS contract terms now in effect, if the once military hovercraft has had all weapons and ITAR controlled navigation and communications systems removed, could it not be &#8220;substantially transformed&#8221; into a commercial ferry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clif Burns</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/828/comment-page-1#comment-91844</link>
		<dc:creator>Clif Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=828#comment-91844</guid>
		<description>@Hamish: That wouldn&#039;t affect the classification here.  What&#039;s relevant here is that it was modified for military use by adding, for example, guns, tank compartments, and nuclear and CBW shelters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Hamish: That wouldn&#8217;t affect the classification here.  What&#8217;s relevant here is that it was modified for military use by adding, for example, guns, tank compartments, and nuclear and CBW shelters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hamish</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/828/comment-page-1#comment-91843</link>
		<dc:creator>Hamish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=828#comment-91843</guid>
		<description>Cliff

In the past, at least, a hovercraft was treated as an aircraft in the UK and you required a Pilot&#039;s Licence rather than a Master&#039;s Ticket to drive one over a certain size.

Would this affect the Classification?

Hamish</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cliff</p>
<p>In the past, at least, a hovercraft was treated as an aircraft in the UK and you required a Pilot&#8217;s Licence rather than a Master&#8217;s Ticket to drive one over a certain size.</p>
<p>Would this affect the Classification?</p>
<p>Hamish</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Q. Citizen</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/828/comment-page-1#comment-91836</link>
		<dc:creator>John Q. Citizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 20:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=828#comment-91836</guid>
		<description>How funny is this...  If you go to Portland Yacht&#039;s home page, there&#039;s a link called &quot;International Export&quot; which advises that &quot;You can&#039;t afford to deal with amateurs.&quot;  If I lived in Portland I would be parked near PYS&#039;s office at 8am on Monday to count how many black SUVs show up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How funny is this&#8230;  If you go to Portland Yacht&#8217;s home page, there&#8217;s a link called &#8220;International Export&#8221; which advises that &#8220;You can&#8217;t afford to deal with amateurs.&#8221;  If I lived in Portland I would be parked near PYS&#8217;s office at 8am on Monday to count how many black SUVs show up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Dickeson</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/828/comment-page-1#comment-91834</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Dickeson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 03:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=828#comment-91834</guid>
		<description>Hey, Portland Yacht Sales, if you&#039;re reading this, you timing is perfect:

http://www.buyusa.gov/oregon/itar.html

See you there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Portland Yacht Sales, if you&#8217;re reading this, you timing is perfect:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.buyusa.gov/oregon/itar.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.buyusa.gov/oregon/itar.html</a></p>
<p>See you there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LaurenM</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/828/comment-page-1#comment-91831</link>
		<dc:creator>LaurenM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=828#comment-91831</guid>
		<description>Wow... genius alert. Guess they will know about it now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230; genius alert. Guess they will know about it now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JOHN LIEBMAN</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/828/comment-page-1#comment-91830</link>
		<dc:creator>JOHN LIEBMAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=828#comment-91830</guid>
		<description>All I ever get are off-color jokes.  Where does Garrett get his material?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I ever get are off-color jokes.  Where does Garrett get his material?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/828/comment-page-1#comment-91829</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=828#comment-91829</guid>
		<description>Hey Clif,

If I buy this will your firm help me get it imported?  That thing could really help with traffic here in Los Angeles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Clif,</p>
<p>If I buy this will your firm help me get it imported?  That thing could really help with traffic here in Los Angeles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
