http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/69 Latest News on DDTC, BIS, OFAC, and other export law matters Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:15:19 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/69#comment-438 ExportLawBlog » Compliance and Rejection Division Mon, 22 Jan 2007 21:08:35 +0000 http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/69#comment-438 [...] This seemingly innocent promise should be filed in the “I Told You So” Folder. DDTC’s new informal guidelines under Part 129 expanded the scope of overseas sales representatives that will now be required to file registration applications. Most of these sales reps are foreign nationals for whom English is not their first language and for whom correctly filing out a Form DS-2032 is complicated by DDTC’s confusing and inconsistent instructions as we’ve pointed out before. So we predicted a wave of deficient registration applications and it now seems we were probably right. Permalink No Comments [...] [...] This seemingly innocent promise should be filed in the “I Told You So” Folder. DDTC’s new informal guidelines under Part 129 expanded the scope of overseas sales representatives that will now be required to file registration applications. Most of these sales reps are foreign nationals for whom English is not their first language and for whom correctly filing out a Form DS-2032 is complicated by DDTC’s confusing and inconsistent instructions as we’ve pointed out before. So we predicted a wave of deficient registration applications and it now seems we were probably right. Permalink No Comments [...]

]]> http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/69#comment-215 T Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:19:17 +0000 http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/69#comment-215 I have personally recieved a gaggle of RWA's for components because they lack a DSP-83. These applications are for non-SME items destined for NATO countries. Unfortunately, the bulk of our license applications (approximately 40), rest with one person. A fantastic way to shift your workload at the State Department is to RWA citing lack of a DSP-83. D-Trade supports the capability to upload the DSP-83 as additional documentation but instead we are being RWA'd. Way to go State Department! I have personally recieved a gaggle of RWA’s for components because they lack a DSP-83. These applications are for non-SME items destined for NATO countries. Unfortunately, the bulk of our license applications (approximately 40), rest with one person. A fantastic way to shift your workload at the State Department is to RWA citing lack of a DSP-83. D-Trade supports the capability to upload the DSP-83 as additional documentation but instead we are being RWA’d. Way to go State Department!

]]>