Dec

9

New Indictment Issued in Halal Export Case


Posted by at 11:34 pm on December 9, 2014
Category: Agricultural ExportsCriminal Penalties

Midamar Halal Pizza via http://www.midamarhalal.com/Product/Pizza/Halal-Pizza/166/Halal-Beef-Pepperoni-Pizza-12in-bake-Rise.aspx [Fair Use]The Feds have stepped up their game in the Midamar prosecution, initially discussed here, by indicting more defendants and providing more detail in the new indictment as to the nature of the alleged activities. The initial indictment charged William Aossey Jr. with falsely stating on export certificates that meat had been slaughtered in a Halal-certified slaughterhouse.

The new indictment adds Mr. Aossey’s sons and Midamar itself. Based on comments we received from Midamar to our original post, it appeared that a central part of Midamar’s argument was that even if the meat was not slaughtered in Halal-certified slaughterhouses, the meat was still Halal meat as represented by the company.

The facts set forth in the new indictment seem to be directly aimed at this argument, going into the specific ways in which the slaughtered meat did not comport with the Halal standards that Midamar detailed on its own website. The non-Halal practices detailed in the indictment included: (a) the use of penetrative stun guns to kill animals, (b) the slaughter of cattle by slaughtermen that were not Muslim, and (c) the slaughter of cattle without the recitation of the requisite prayers. These non-Halal practices rendered false, according to the Government’s theory, the statements on export certificates that the meat complied with the requirements of the importing countries, all of which required that such meat be Halal.

In addition to my discomfort with the prosecutor’s delving so deeply into the religious matter of what is and isn’t Halal slaughter, it seems that there is little evidence that the defendants knew that the slaughterhouses were not always complying with the letter of Muslim religious practice. The only evidence in this regard mentioned in the indictment is the relabeling of meat by Midamar employees to indicate that the meat in question came from a slaughterhouse other than the one from which the meat actually came. Above and beyond that, you have to wonder why the U.S. government is expending such considerable resources to prosecute a case which ultimately deals with whether cows were slaughtered by Muslims while reciting specified ritual prayers.

Permalink

Bookmark and Share

Copyright © 2014 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)


2 Comments:


Why is the government suddenly so concerned about Halal slaughter methods? Are there no criminals to go after in this country?

There is a logical answer for each of the comments above:

Stun guns are often used AFTER the slaughter and considered halal. A Muslim slaughterman is present even when a Rabbi or a machine is present and this is considered by some as halal and by other interpretations not halal. The meat of the Christians and Jews (people of the book) if slaughtered properly is considered halal by some and not by others.

Using information from a website is weak at best. The halal process is evolving and so is information on halal sites. Finally, slaughterman do not have to invoke the name of God out loud, they can mumble it or say it in their head.

The government needs to stick to what it knows and stay out of religious rituals.

Comment by Yalateef on December 10th, 2014 @ 11:33 pm

Please note, there are many news agencies are publishing half-truths and misleading information concerning Midamar in articles. This is an exporting issue where Midamar allegedly changed labels on Halal certified products from a Halal source so that they could be exported. Midimar is a small, family owned and operated Company. I used to work at the Company and can attest that management operates the business with integrity and cares about doing Halal right. Midamar does not and never has engaged in captive bolt stunning. Midimar’s reputable certifiers which include Islamic Services of America, Halal Advocates, IFANCA, ISWA, and others will also attest to Midimar’s integrity as a Halal meat company. Do not be swayed by false statements. Reserve judgment and suspicion until the company is able to formulate a defense. This is important for the whole halal industry.

Comment by Alisson on December 17th, 2014 @ 5:38 pm