Sep

4

Lost in Translation


Posted by at 5:24 pm on September 4, 2014
Category: OFACSDN List

By Uris at en.wikipedia [GFDL (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html) or CC-BY-SA-3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/)], from Wikimedia Commons http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ACitibank_Chinatown.jpgYesterday the Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) announced that it had fined Citigroup $217,841 in connection with its processing certain transactions involving Iran and one involving a Syrian entity on the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (the “SDN List”).

The SDN List issue is particularly interesting because the SDN List had what may be an incorrect name for the SDN involved and Citigroup, which had what appears to be the correct name, failed to block the transaction. At issue is Syria’s Higher Institute for Applied Science and Technology (“HIAST”) which appears on the SDN List as the Higher Institute of Applied Science and Technology. When Citibank ran a computer program to screen the name”Higher Institute for Applied Science and Technology” it didn’t pick up the “Higher Institute of Applied Science and Technology” because it was not an exact match.

Notwithstanding OFAC arguably getting HIAST’s name wrong,* it is fairly clear that screening procedures need to employ at least some fuzzy logic and not insist on exact word-for-word, letter-for-letter matches, particularly where many of the names on the SDN List have been transliterated or translated into English. The OFAC announcement indicated that Citigroup had “implemented a programmatic fix” of some kind, one which would apparently allow “of” to match “for” and vice versa.


*HIAST’s Facebook page uses “Higher Institute for Applied Science and Technology” as does Wikipedia and most other sources. Oddly, HIAST’s webpage uses “Higher Institute of Applied Sciences and Technology.” Only OFAC appears to be using “Higher Institute of Applied Science and Technology.” Given OFAC’s almost comical reliance on AKAs for many other listings, there is no reason for it to fail to add all the known variants in HIAST’s listing. That way even stupid systems would pick up the match

Permalink

Bookmark and Share


One Comment:


It is common for Chinese nationals to transliterate their names using several different Romanization systems. When I translated crew statements for a marine survey company in Taiwan, I began the practice of including the Chinese characters of their names, thus allowing positive identification regardless of which Romanization they were using at a given time.

The criminal element in Asia knows that it can throw law enforcement agencies off their trail with a bit of creative transliteration. Thus, Li Bing-qian can be legally written also as Bing Qian Li, as the surname can preceed or follow the given name. By eliminating the hyphen, a person can more easily hide his actual surname.

The surname Li can be spelled Lee or Lea, while the Bing can be spelled Ping, and the Qian can be spelled Chien, Chian, or Chyan. Many aliases can be derived by mixing and matching these various spellings.

These transliteration games can be applied also to company names and addresses, so fuzzy logic may not get you where you want to go with Chinese entities.

Comment by Wumingren on September 5th, 2014 @ 9:57 am

Leave a Reply

Comments are moderated, so your comment may take a little while to appear.

Don't like the default "blank face" gravatar in your comment? Pick your very own gravatar here.