Comments on: DDTC Announces New License Documentation Requirements http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/328 Latest News on DDTC, BIS, OFAC, and other export law matters Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:43:29 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: SReuer http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/328/comment-page-1#comment-10706 SReuer Mon, 19 May 2008 17:28:24 +0000 http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/328#comment-10706 Clif - the "one year" PO requirement was explained to me by an unnamed source at DDTC as an outgrowth of their frustration that industry could "sit" on a PO for such long periods of time and then have the chutzpah to request expedited processing of license applications. Clif – the “one year” PO requirement was explained to me by an unnamed source at DDTC as an outgrowth of their frustration that industry could “sit” on a PO for such long periods of time and then have the chutzpah to request expedited processing of license applications.

]]> By: Library: A Round-up of Reading « Res Communis http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/328/comment-page-1#comment-10193 Library: A Round-up of Reading « Res Communis Mon, 05 May 2008 16:45:25 +0000 http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/328#comment-10193 [...] DDTC Announces New License Documentation Requirements- Export Law Blog [...] [...] DDTC Announces New License Documentation Requirements- Export Law Blog [...]

]]>