<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Best Acronym Ever:  &#8220;POOF&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/305/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/305</link>
	<description>Latest News on DDTC, BIS, OFAC, and other export law matters</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 11:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: LIBRARY: A Round-up of Reading &#171; Res Communis</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/305#comment-8878</link>
		<dc:creator>LIBRARY: A Round-up of Reading &#171; Res Communis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/305#comment-8878</guid>
		<description>[...] Blogs Best Acronym Ever: “POOF” - ExportLawBlog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blogs Best Acronym Ever: “POOF” - ExportLawBlog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/305#comment-8816</link>
		<dc:creator>Pamela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/305#comment-8816</guid>
		<description>The irony is that at an Export class someone asked if a license would be required to ship things to other planets.
Needless to say, all of us just bursted out laughing.
We finally learned that the actual export would be to over seas and from their, another company would try to put things on other planets. I dont think the director of the seminar ever gave us a direct answer to her question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The irony is that at an Export class someone asked if a license would be required to ship things to other planets.<br />
Needless to say, all of us just bursted out laughing.<br />
We finally learned that the actual export would be to over seas and from their, another company would try to put things on other planets. I dont think the director of the seminar ever gave us a direct answer to her question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LDM</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/305#comment-8790</link>
		<dc:creator>LDM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/305#comment-8790</guid>
		<description>Why do I have the image of someone at the DOS with a really big stick pin in their hand?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do I have the image of someone at the DOS with a really big stick pin in their hand?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kndl</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/305#comment-8771</link>
		<dc:creator>Kndl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 22:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/305#comment-8771</guid>
		<description>It probably doesn't matter that filing the CJ will lock POOF into ITAR control until further notice.  Just applying for ITAR authority would probably be quicker.  Maybe the problem is they want to apply for export authority NOW, but don't yet know what hardware/data will need to be exported later, or to where. I've heard US Gov agencies make that suggestion under similar circumstances. 

Ken</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It probably doesn&#8217;t matter that filing the CJ will lock POOF into ITAR control until further notice.  Just applying for ITAR authority would probably be quicker.  Maybe the problem is they want to apply for export authority NOW, but don&#8217;t yet know what hardware/data will need to be exported later, or to where. I&#8217;ve heard US Gov agencies make that suggestion under similar circumstances. </p>
<p>Ken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
