<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BIS Announces Modification of AES Filing Requirements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/287/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/287</link>
	<description>Latest News on DDTC, BIS, OFAC, and other export law matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:51:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clif Burns</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/287/comment-page-1#comment-7743</link>
		<dc:creator>Clif Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 12:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/287#comment-7743</guid>
		<description>Validation?  Hah!  That&#039;s what the Automated Export System Trade Interface Requirements Manual is for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Validation?  Hah!  That&#8217;s what the Automated Export System Trade Interface Requirements Manual is for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Dickeson</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/287/comment-page-1#comment-7730</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Dickeson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 03:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/287#comment-7730</guid>
		<description>Does this mean that Census is finally building some sorely needed BIS-related validation into AES?  Or does this just mean they will continue to accept the errors as before, only now they will penalize you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this mean that Census is finally building some sorely needed BIS-related validation into AES?  Or does this just mean they will continue to accept the errors as before, only now they will penalize you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
