Comments on: BIS Rules Don’t Consider the Safety of U.S. Contractors in Iraq http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/227 Latest News on DDTC, BIS, OFAC, and other export law matters Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:50:50 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Mike http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/227#comment-4281 Mike Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:03:56 +0000 http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/227#comment-4281 Cliff, et.al, I love your blog! I check this place everyday and haven't a bad word to say. Thanks for informative and real life commenatary on the Issues.. it serves as a great asset to me in my business of Export Control. Thanks again, keep up the good work -- and most importantly -- Forget about those Trolls :-). Cliff, et.al,

I love your blog! I check this place everyday and haven’t a bad word to say. Thanks for informative and real life commenatary on the Issues.. it serves as a great asset to me in my business of Export Control. Thanks again, keep up the good work — and most importantly — Forget about those Trolls :-).

]]> By: Matthew J. Lancaster http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/227#comment-4169 Matthew J. Lancaster Sat, 22 Sep 2007 05:13:24 +0000 http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/227#comment-4169 Protective Gear comes in a couple of different shades - the lighter of which falls within the jurisdiction of BIS. My recommendation to all non-government entities deploying folks to Iraq or Afghanistan would be to upgrade to the better stuff. It is commercially available in the US, offers employees superior protection, and is likley available for DDTC's expedited licensing route. Protective Gear comes in a couple of different shades - the lighter of which falls within the jurisdiction of BIS. My recommendation to all non-government entities deploying folks to Iraq or Afghanistan would be to upgrade to the better stuff. It is commercially available in the US, offers employees superior protection, and is likley available for DDTC’s expedited licensing route.

]]>