<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Living Up to Carp</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/194/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/194</link>
	<description>Latest News on DDTC, BIS, OFAC, and other export law matters</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Deal</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/194#comment-2955</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 17:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/194#comment-2955</guid>
		<description>An net abaitment of a proposed penalty of that scale is nothing to carp about.  One does have to wonder which line hooked OFAC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An net abaitment of a proposed penalty of that scale is nothing to carp about.  One does have to wonder which line hooked OFAC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
