<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Foreign Cows Moo a Sigh of Relief</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/18/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/18</link>
	<description>Latest News on DDTC, BIS, OFAC, and other export law matters</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 02:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ExportLawBlog &#187; The Prods That Keep on Prodding</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/18#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>ExportLawBlog &#187; The Prods That Keep on Prodding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 17:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/18#comment-21</guid>
		<description>[...] Earlier we reported on the misfortunes of The Springer Magrath Company, a Nebraska-based agricultural supply house that had shipped cattle prods to South Africa without a license. Cattle prods are controlled because they can be used in human rights violations and require licenses from BIS for exports to all destinations. Criminal charges based on those exports were settled for an agreement by Springer Magrath to pay a fine of $50,000. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Earlier we reported on the misfortunes of The Springer Magrath Company, a Nebraska-based agricultural supply house that had shipped cattle prods to South Africa without a license. Cattle prods are controlled because they can be used in human rights violations and require licenses from BIS for exports to all destinations. Criminal charges based on those exports were settled for an agreement by Springer Magrath to pay a fine of $50,000. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
