<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DDTC Blames Registration Chaos on Applicants</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/147/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/147</link>
	<description>Latest News on DDTC, BIS, OFAC, and other export law matters</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Hallett</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/147#comment-1915</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Hallett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 17:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/147#comment-1915</guid>
		<description>You would think with all of the taxes we pay they could have an online fillable application and a method to file electronically.  Oh, I forgot they still use typewriters and carbon paper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You would think with all of the taxes we pay they could have an online fillable application and a method to file electronically.  Oh, I forgot they still use typewriters and carbon paper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emperor'sNewClothes</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/147#comment-1661</link>
		<dc:creator>Emperor'sNewClothes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 23:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/147#comment-1661</guid>
		<description>"Do not arouse the wrath of the great and powerful Oz."  Um, "Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain...."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Do not arouse the wrath of the great and powerful Oz.&#8221;  Um, &#8220;Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Deal</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/147#comment-1660</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 22:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/147#comment-1660</guid>
		<description>This is why DDTC should not be excluded from the Administrative Procedures Act.  Actually, if you go back to the legislative history of the APA in 1946, the foreign affairs exclusion was intended to apply only to diplomatic functions, not regulatory functions (otherwise, if excluded from the APA, why would Congress have had to include the exemption of judicial review for determination of what's on the USML). That said, DDTC has fraudulently claimed total exemption from the APA for do long that it could plausibly plead Congressional acceptance its lie.  The supine exporting community has only itself to blame for failing to challenge the lords of export control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why DDTC should not be excluded from the Administrative Procedures Act.  Actually, if you go back to the legislative history of the APA in 1946, the foreign affairs exclusion was intended to apply only to diplomatic functions, not regulatory functions (otherwise, if excluded from the APA, why would Congress have had to include the exemption of judicial review for determination of what&#8217;s on the USML). That said, DDTC has fraudulently claimed total exemption from the APA for do long that it could plausibly plead Congressional acceptance its lie.  The supine exporting community has only itself to blame for failing to challenge the lords of export control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/147#comment-1657</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 18:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/147#comment-1657</guid>
		<description>Great.  I guess I can expect the same level of service as last year in our renewal....they LOST my packet 3 TIMES last year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great.  I guess I can expect the same level of service as last year in our renewal&#8230;.they LOST my packet 3 TIMES last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
