<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Deemed Export Red Tape Courtesy of BCIS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1366/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1366</link>
	<description>Latest News on DDTC, BIS, OFAC, and other export law matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:51:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TH</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1366/comment-page-1#comment-92952</link>
		<dc:creator>TH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=1366#comment-92952</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s bad enough having to wait when applying for a Visa, on top of that now having to wait for a response from BIS after submission of the deemed export license. How much more difficult can this get?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s bad enough having to wait when applying for a Visa, on top of that now having to wait for a response from BIS after submission of the deemed export license. How much more difficult can this get?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clif Burns</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1366/comment-page-1#comment-92951</link>
		<dc:creator>Clif Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=1366#comment-92951</guid>
		<description>@David:  Yes, I should have mentioned that the deemed export questions have to be answered whether or not a deemed export license is needed.  Additionally, as I said in the post, I never would have found the proposed changes if you hadn&#039;t run them down.  OMB ought to insist that these FR notices clearly disclose what is proposed or provide a specific link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@David:  Yes, I should have mentioned that the deemed export questions have to be answered whether or not a deemed export license is needed.  Additionally, as I said in the post, I never would have found the proposed changes if you hadn&#8217;t run them down.  OMB ought to insist that these FR notices clearly disclose what is proposed or provide a specific link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Brady</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1366/comment-page-1#comment-92949</link>
		<dc:creator>David Brady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=1366#comment-92949</guid>
		<description>Cliff, the docs are found in case USCIS 2005-0030 to which they were posted on 2/16 and 2/18.  Oddly, the FR entry is in USCIS 2006-0028, go figure. An important note to employers however, this form has to be filled out regardless of whether a deemed export license is required. Apparently you have to disclose any technology to which the foreign employee will have access- whether or not an export license is required. See page 7 of the Table of changes in USCIS 2005-0030-0193.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cliff, the docs are found in case USCIS 2005-0030 to which they were posted on 2/16 and 2/18.  Oddly, the FR entry is in USCIS 2006-0028, go figure. An important note to employers however, this form has to be filled out regardless of whether a deemed export license is required. Apparently you have to disclose any technology to which the foreign employee will have access- whether or not an export license is required. See page 7 of the Table of changes in USCIS 2005-0030-0193.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
