Comments on: Chi Mak Export Trial Begins

By: Timothy Anh Tang

Timothy Anh Tang — Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:57:37 +0000

Sorry Clif…..I should not let people like that get under my skin.

By: Clif Burns

Clif Burns — Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:37:27 +0000

The comments section is to discuss the substantive issues not to engage in personal attacks or name calling. If this continues, I will have to start deleting comments.

By: Timothy Anh Tang

Timothy Anh Tang — Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:50:37 +0000

Go ahead and hide like a litte PUNK. Why not be a man and put your name like everyone else and stop hiding. If you believe in what you are saying, you would not hide. You are a COWARD!!!!, whoever you are. I have more respect for Charles than you. So…, go back to your hole and don’t come out again. We will all happy for it. Peace.

By: timothy_is_ a_ taiwanese_ weasel

timothy_is_ a_ taiwanese_ weasel — Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:30:22 +0000

timothy is probably a cHRISTIAN, a gwei-loh who happens to be asian, or a pro-independence taiwanese goon pretending he’s offering a level headed analysis of the situation. The U.S. government purposefully through gross distortions, outright-lies, and the use of legalistic semantic-parsing games( a practice they demonstrated throughout this administration such as with IRAQ, other so called “Chinese-espionage” cases, and that articulate GONZALES), to create an atmosphere of persistent harassment and intimidation among the Chinese scientific community (the government just only want to use our intellectual power, use us up, and then dispose of us in the trash) so that we become distrustful of each other…because “who knows where this Chinese spy is lurking among us” and effectively” put us in our place” through paralysis from FEAR.

By: Timothy Anh Tang

Timothy Anh Tang — Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:33:18 +0000

Hello Charles, you know..,I like the way you twist and turn everything around, good, but not good enough. I will stand-by every comment I have written on this site. If you get a neutral third party to read my comments and yours…they would come to a different conclusion than you. I believe in the constitution more then what you believe my friend. I’m not the one who is “putting down” the country. I’m not the one who is saying “let everyone go” regardless if the government has evidence or not. It’s you, not me!! But, I like to read your comments and I can see we will not agree on anything here….even though I have tried.

By: Charles Liu

Charles Liu — Mon, 16 Apr 2007 20:58:53 +0000

Tim, your betraying this country comment says it all. It’s obvious you do not believe in our constitution.

I am 100% certain Mak is innocent; he has not been found guilty. Until his guilt is proven, our constitution says Mak is presumed 100% innocent.

And no, it’s not because it’s the government; it’s the fact our government has abused it’s position in the prosecution of the Mak case (leaking indictment; false indictment of classified documents.)

By: Timothy Anh Tang

Timothy Anh Tang — Fri, 13 Apr 2007 02:40:18 +0000

Charles…., yes we have different opinions, but one thing I’m trying to do is…find out where you coming from my friend, that is it. I know you have a strong opinion about this, but in my statement to you on April 5th, is because, you and I don’t have all the facts.

How can you make a decision on news info and web blogs??? Unless you really have some other real info. You really don’t know what the government has on Mr. Mak or you really don’t know what Mr. Mak did or did not do.

That is why I’m keeping an open mind. You my friend are just jumping to conclusions; just because it’s the government. If you know for a fact he is innocent, please let me know so I can be with you 100%; but I’m not going give someone a “free ride” just because they are chinese like me and/or betraying this country.

By: Charles Liu

Charles Liu — Mon, 09 Apr 2007 22:50:33 +0000

And you did jude me: “If anyone is starting mass hysteria, its you my friend.” What is that?

I’m sure as you would demand for yourself, let the Mak case go to court without being tainted by government misconduct.

Short of that, Chi Mak shouldn’t even be subject to repeated indictment, none the less a show trial based on twisted reasoning.

By: Timothy Anh Tang

Timothy Anh Tang — Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:27:48 +0000

Charles, that is what I’m saying…..let him have his day in court!!! But it seem like you just want him to be release, period. I’m willing to wait and see what happens in court. But you don’t want him to go to court at all. Yes, Mr. Mak is innocent until proven otherwise.

I think I never judge you. If I did, I would sound like that staffer you talked about. I’m just trying to understand how did you get to this point, nothing more.

By: Charles Liu

Charles Liu — Thu, 05 Apr 2007 20:56:00 +0000

Tim, you are missing the point. Chi Mak didn’t steal anything. I can not agree with you, because:

1) you seem to have judged Chi Mak, just like the government. I must remind you again Chi Mak is innocent until proven guilty.

2) I already explained to you my personal experience, and yes I am motivation by that. Aren’t you judging me with that “secret agenda” stuff? You are in no position to judge me until it happens to you, especially after I’ve told you what happened.