<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UAE Moved From Naughty to Nice List</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/131/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/131</link>
	<description>Latest News on DDTC, BIS, OFAC, and other export law matters</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ExportLawBlog &#187; What Goes on in Dubai Doesn&#8217;t Stay in Dubai</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/131#comment-7970</link>
		<dc:creator>ExportLawBlog &#187; What Goes on in Dubai Doesn&#8217;t Stay in Dubai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/131#comment-7970</guid>
		<description>[...] That doesn&#8217;t appear to be what officials of the UAE were telling the U.S. government when they convinced U.S. officials not to put the UAE on Schedule C to the EAR as a country of &#8220;diversionary concern.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That doesn&#8217;t appear to be what officials of the UAE were telling the U.S. government when they convinced U.S. officials not to put the UAE on Schedule C to the EAR as a country of &#8220;diversionary concern.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
