<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: @Ahmadinejad: Twitter Is Coming to Town. #IranElection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1099/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1099</link>
	<description>Latest News on DDTC, BIS, OFAC, and other export law matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:51:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1099/comment-page-1#comment-92183</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=1099#comment-92183</guid>
		<description>Speaking of twitter...
http://news.softpedia.com/news/Social-Engineering-Used-to-Compromise-Twitter-117172.shtml
 
http://www.thetechherald.com/article.php/200918/3586/Twitter-confirms-admin-account-compromise</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of twitter&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://news.softpedia.com/news/Social-Engineering-Used-to-Compromise-Twitter-117172.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://news.softpedia.com/news/Social-Engineering-Used-to-Compromise-Twitter-117172.shtml</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.thetechherald.com/article.php/200918/3586/Twitter-confirms-admin-account-compromise" rel="nofollow">http://www.thetechherald.com/article.php/200918/3586/Twitter-confirms-admin-account-compromise</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ex-OFAC</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1099/comment-page-1#comment-92182</link>
		<dc:creator>ex-OFAC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=1099#comment-92182</guid>
		<description>Clif -- Your question about how Twitter will know it isn&#039;t dealing with Ahmadinejad is certainly on point. State&#039;s waiver sets as a condition that the OFAC license must &quot;specifically exclude from its authorization the direct or indirect exportation of services or software with knowledge or reason to know that such services or software are intended for the Government of Iran.&quot;  It will be important that OFAC&#039;s authorization recognize the difficulty of ascertaining the other party in a cybercommunication, so that U.S. service providers can carry out the goal of the waiver without the threat of a &quot;You had &#039;reason to know&#039;&quot; gotcha for enforcement purposes.  This is one more instance where clarity to the business community would make U.S. sanctions hit their targets, which are not supposed to include U.S. businesses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clif &#8212; Your question about how Twitter will know it isn&#8217;t dealing with Ahmadinejad is certainly on point. State&#8217;s waiver sets as a condition that the OFAC license must &#8220;specifically exclude from its authorization the direct or indirect exportation of services or software with knowledge or reason to know that such services or software are intended for the Government of Iran.&#8221;  It will be important that OFAC&#8217;s authorization recognize the difficulty of ascertaining the other party in a cybercommunication, so that U.S. service providers can carry out the goal of the waiver without the threat of a &#8220;You had &#8216;reason to know&#8217;&#8221; gotcha for enforcement purposes.  This is one more instance where clarity to the business community would make U.S. sanctions hit their targets, which are not supposed to include U.S. businesses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
