<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: House Bill Targets Multinationals in Iran, Misses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/109/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/109</link>
	<description>Latest News on DDTC, BIS, OFAC, and other export law matters</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/109#comment-853</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/109#comment-853</guid>
		<description>The citations in HR 957 are actually correct.  Section 14 of what used to be the Iran Libya Sanctions Act was modified at the end of the last session of Congress by the Iran Freedom Support Act.  Previous section 14(12) was axed and everything below it was moved up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The citations in HR 957 are actually correct.  Section 14 of what used to be the Iran Libya Sanctions Act was modified at the end of the last session of Congress by the Iran Freedom Support Act.  Previous section 14(12) was axed and everything below it was moved up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
